His new wife

Page 1 · Her own description

A retired FBI subcontractor who had been profiling him since 2018

The statement opens by offering “eyewitness testimony and firsthand account knowledge of the attacks by Brandon Brown, then 3rd in command of the FBI against Mr. Horner during his illegal probating at St. Vincent’s Charity Medical Center.”

“I am a 19 year undercover private subcontractor with the FBI (ret.), was at that time a direct report to Mr. Brown with extensive exposure to Dir. Wray, and was the primary agent assigned to profiling Mr. Horner’s (aka Cre3p) cyber work since 2018.”

She adds that she is a licensed LPN with two decades in the medical field, including “extensive mental health experience on the psych ward.” The account that follows says she knew him only by the alias Cre3p until 2022, and met him in person on 11 January 2022.

Filed the same day, his notice of expert disclosure described her differently — as an “FBI special agent, counter cyberterrorism unit (Ret.).”

Expert Report of Cristy Miller, p.1 · Stark v. Horner, No. CV-22-969917

Pages 3–4 · Her account

A telephone call from the founder of Amazon, and $1.5 million

On 30 August 2020, she writes, she received a call from Jeff Bezos, who told her he had been given her information by his “good friend” Christopher Wray, Director of the FBI, and needed help with a cybersecurity breach “because I had personal experience with the attacker.”

She says she analysed the code, reported back, and

“collected the $1.5million cybersecurity subcontractor payment made by Amazon.”

The code, she writes, turned out to be a search sequence for children’s toys made by the company Step 2.

Expert Report, pp.3–4

Pages 2–4 · Her account

The code was reviewed at a hospital bedside, with his wife in the room

She writes that on 22 August 2020 — two days into his detention at St. Vincent Charity — the FBI’s third-in-command handed her a fragment of his code “in my late husband’s Cleveland Clinic hospital room… while I was tending his bedside during cancer treatments.”

Present in the room, on her account, was his then wife, who “was also in the room presenting herself as his cancer trials leader” and “quietly tended his bedside, checked his monitors recording data” while the two of them reviewed it. She says the same official returned on 6 September 2020 and questioned her specifically about his mental health, again with his wife present.

Expert Report, pp.2–4

Page 5 · Her account

The Director of the FBI has a Gmail address, and she set up the introduction

She writes that in March 2022 she and Mr. Horner became romantically involved, that a “rouge operation” [sic] was then run to surveil them both, and that he responded by activating “his classified MinuteMan credentials with Dir. Wray of the FBI.”

“I directly facilitated the introduction with Mr. Horner and Dir Wray and can directly attest to the validity of the ‘tdcommand1@gmail.com’ alias email account belonging to Dir. Wray.”

She says she resigned from the FBI in May 2022, and that “Dir. Wray graciously accepted.”

Emails to and from that account are attached to his own motion of 12 May 2023, under the subject line “Little bitches.” The account writes back to her — “You really do like to get drunk and spill your guts… I haven’t sold any secrets to BRICS despite what you think you know… I would truly hate for it to seem like treason!” — and to him, offering that the two of them “would make perfect candidates for the project” if they would keep quiet. It signs off “A.”

See also. The motion he attached them to, and what it was for.

Expert Report, p.5 · the email chain is Exhibit B to his motion of 12 May 2023, No. CV-22-969917

Page 4 · Her account

The FBI, she says, interfered in his divorce and erased the probate record

She writes that the Director of the FBI personally disclosed to her “the FBI’s interference in his divorce proceedings including the expungement of his probate warrant and mental health records from Cuyahoga County Probate Court systems” — because the Bureau wanted to recruit him and “didn’t want the smug upon his reputation put forth by a scornful ex-wife.”

The expungement has an ordinary explanation. His detention came through the Probate Court under R.C. 5122.11, and R.C. 5122.141 requires that where such a case does not end in a court order, the court “shall expunge all record of the proceedings.” The statute directs it.

See also. The detention, the order and the statute — 19 March 2021 on the timeline.

Expert Report, p.4

Pages 5–6 · Her account

Four things she says the Director of the FBI did to her

The statement lists them under the heading that he “has waged various threats and criminal actions against me.”

• He stole about a million dollars. “Stealing approx. $1million from my private cash on demand checking account with US Bank.” She says she reported it to a named local detective, who identified the Director as the offender and took it to the district attorney, the chief of police and the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, “all of which say ‘they don’t have the power to take on the FBI so the best thing I can do is just forget about it.’”
• He sent an operative who was found dead, and then wasn’t. A “criminal intelligence operative (CIA/NSA)” was deployed to bug their home and stalk them, with “continuous written reference by Mr. Wray ‘listening to us fucking.’” She writes that she obtained restraining orders, and that the sheriff’s deputies serving them “found him dead in his truck.” This, she says, “was later revealed as a forged death… when [he] was identified through facial recognition software on the security footage” of a bar, stalking her on a night out with friends.
• A dead animal, and then the brakes. “I received a direct dead animal death threat with a gloating email by Mr. Wray proud of what they had done.” Not long after, she writes, her car’s hydraulic brakes and hydraulic power steering “(independent systems) failed simultaneously on a dark curvy road” despite recent servicing.
• He writes to her about her sex life. She says she receives consistent written communication from the Director referring to her “being a whore,” attempting “to drive a wedge” between them by insinuating infidelity, and predicting that one day she will understand how his ex-wife felt when he leaves her “with his kids as a single mother. This despite Mr. Horner being one of the most dedicated fathers I’ve ever seen.”

Expert Report, pp.5–6

25 April 2023 · His filing, his oath

He told the court he would be sitting before Congress with the Director of the FBI

Two days before her statement was disclosed, he filed his own supplemental disclosures under Civ.R. 26. The first person he lists as likely to have discoverable information is “Cristy Miller, FBI special operations (Ret.).” Among the documents he lists are

“Other documents provided to Defendant by Christopher Wray, FBI Director, in relations to Defendant’s Federal Minuteman investigation.”

Under damages, he claims economic loss in excess of $3.5 million, itemised to include

“costs to go before the US Congress alongside Christopher Wray, FBI Director, to remove Defendant’s name from federal terrorist watch lists.”

The filing carries a Defendant Affidavit swearing its contents are “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth… under penalty of perjury.”

Defendant’s Supplemental Disclosures, 25 April 2023, pp.1–2 and 4 · Stark v. Horner, No. CV-22-969917

30 January – 27 April 2023 · Court record

One document, three cases, three different labels

The same statement was filed as an “Amicus Brief and Discovery Evidence” in his suit against the Cleveland Clinic; as a near-identical brief in the civil stalking protection order case the Clinic had brought against him; and, on 27 April 2023, disclosed in the defamation case as an “Expert Report” under the rule governing treating expert witnesses. She had treated no one.

Within its own pages it calls itself an expert report, an amicus brief, an amicus affidavit and eyewitness testimony. It carries two signature blocks — one “Amicus and Eyewitness for Defendant,” the other, on the sworn page, “for Plaintiff.”

Nos. CV-22-965121, CV-22-969917, and the Clinic’s protection order petition of 1 Nov 2022 · plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and sanctions, 19 May 2023, n.12

See also. The chronology entry — 30 January to 27 April 2023.

2 August 2023 · 26 February 2024 · Court findings

No court relied on it

No judge ever ruled on whether any of this was true. The statement was never tested, and nothing in it appears in any finding of fact. What the court did instead was grant summary judgment against him on 2 August 2023, declare him a vexatious litigator the same day, and enter judgment of $907,002.13 on 26 February 2024, later $1,064,234.75 with fees.

He did not attend the trial.

See also. The judgment and what it was for · the vexatious litigator declaration.

Stark v. Horner, No. CV-22-969917